IN RE DAVIS/BOLDUC MINORS

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS In the Matter of MATTHEW CHARLES DAVIS, CODY RAY BALDUC, and TRAVIS JAMES BOLDUC, Minors. FAMILY INDEPENDENCE AGENCY, UNPUBLISHED March 26, 1999 Petitioner-Appellee, v No. 206384 Wayne Juvenile Court LC No. 92-302092 LYNDA BAXTER, née WACHT, Respondent-Appellant, and JEFFREY GRIMES and BRENT BOLDUC, a/k/a BRENT BALDUC, Respondents. Before: O’Connell, P.J., and Jansen and Collins, JJ. MEMORANDUM. Respondent-appellant appeals as of right from a juvenile court order terminating her parental rights to the minor children under MCL 712A.19b(3)(a)(ii), (c)(i), (g) and (j); MSA 27.3178(598.19b)(3)(a)(ii), (c)(i), (g) and (j). We affirm. The juvenile court did not clearly err in finding that the statutory grounds for termination under §§ 19b(3)(c)(i), (g) and (j) were established by clear and convincing evidence. In re Hall-Smith, 222 Mich App 470, 472-473; 564 NW2d 156 (1997); In re Vasquez, 199 Mich App 44, 51-52; 501 NW2d 231 (1993). In addition, respondent-appellant failed to show that termination of her parental rights was clearly not in the children’s best interests. MCL 712A.19b(5); MSA 27.3178(598.19b)(5). -1­ Therefore, the juvenile court did not err in terminating respondent-appellant’s parental rights to the children. In re Hall-Smith, supra. Affirmed. /s/ Peter D. O’Connell /s/ Kathleen Jansen /s/ Jeffrey G. Collins -2­

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.