IN RE SCOTT MINORS

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS In the Matter of ALAKE RADHIYA SCOTT and ZAIRE UKIAH SCOTT, Minors. FAMILY INDEPENDENCE AGENCY, UNPUBLISHED October 9, 1998 Petitioner-Appellee, v No. 206303 Wayne Juvenile Court LC No. 93-309711 MARY THERESA SCOTT, Respondent-Appellant, and KEVIN CALE and DARRYL HAMILTON, Respondents. Before: Whitbeck, P.J., and McDonald and T. G. Hicks*, JJ. MEMORANDUM. Respondent-appellant appeals as of right the juvenile court order terminating her parental rights to the minor children under MCL 712A.19b(3)(b)(i), (c)(i), (g) and (j); MSA 27.3178(598.19b)(3)(b)(i), (c)(i), (g) and (j). We affirm. 1 The juvenile court did not clearly err in finding that the statutory grounds for termination were established by clear and convincing evidence. MCR 5.974(I); In re Miller, 433 Mich 331, 337; 445 NW2d 161 (1989). Furthermore, respondent-appellant failed to show that termination of her parental rights was clearly not in the children’s best interests. MCL 712A.19b(5); MSA 27.3178(598.19b)(5); In re Hall-Smith, 222 Mich App 470, 472-473; 564 NW2d 156 (1997). Thus, the juvenile court did not err in terminating respondent-appellant’s parental rights. * Circuit judge, sitting on the Court of Appeals by assignment. -1­ Affirmed. /s/ William C. Whitbeck /s/ Gary R. McDonald /s/ Timothy G. Hicks 1 The respondent fathers of the minor children, Kevin Cale and Darryl Hamilton, have not appealed the termination of their parental rights. -2­

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.