IN RE TYSHONE BUTLER
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MICHIGAN
COURT OF APPEALS
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,
UNPUBLISHED
February 13, 1998
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v
No. 189922
Wayne Probate Court
LC No. 94-321778
TYSHONE BUTLER,
Defendant-Appellant.
Before: Markey, P.J., and Doctoroff and Smolenski, JJ.
MEMORANDUM.
Defendant entered a plea of admission to carjacking, MCL 750.529a(1); MSA 28.797a(1),
and was committed to the custody of the Department of Social Services. Defendant appeals as of right.
We affirm.
Defendant raises four issues, all of which challenge the adequacy of the factual basis supplied by
defendant in support of his plea. Defendant has waived appellate consideration of his challenges to the
adequacy of the factual basis supplied in support of his plea by failing to move to withdraw his plea in
the trial court, raising the same issues below as he now raises on appeal. People v Baugh, 127 Mich
App 245, 247; 338 NW2d 199 (1983).
Nevertheless, defendant’s admissions that he knew the carjacking was going to occur, that he
served as a look out for his two codefendants who actually took the van from its owner at gun-point,
and that he was to warn his codefendants taking the van if the police were approaching to allow them
time to escape apprehension were sufficient t establish defendant’s guilt of aiding and abetting a
o
carjacking. MCL 767.39; MSA 28.979; MCL 750.529a(1); MSA 28.797(a)(1); People v Sean
Jones (On Rehearing), 201 Mich App 449, 451; 506 NW2d 542 (1993); See People v Sarres, 188
Mich App 475, 476; 470 NW2d 86 (1991).
Affirmed.
-1
/s/ Jane E. Markey
/s/ Martin M. Doctoroff
/s/ Michael R. Smolenski
-2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
