CINDY LESHINSKY V COUNTY OF OAKLAND
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MICHIGAN
COURT OF APPEALS
CINDY LESHINSKY,
UNPUBLISHED
February 10, 1998
Plaintiff-Appellant,
and
HENRY LESHINSKY,
Plaintiff,
v
OAKLAND COUNTY, OAKLAND COUNTY
ROAD COMMISSION, CITY OF SOUTHFIELD,
SOUTHFIELD WATER & SEWER
DEPARTMENT, HUBBELL, ROTH & CLARK,
INC., and INSITUFORM NORTH, INC., a/k/a
INSTITUFORM NORTH,
No. 196316
Oakland Circuit Court
LC No. 95-498462-NZ
Defendants-Appellees.
Before: Markey, P.J., and Doctoroff and Smolenski, JJ.
MEMORANDUM.
Plaintiff appeals by right an order summarily dismissing her action for trespass-nuisance and
intentional infliction of emotional distress pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(10). We affirm.
Plaintiff has abandoned appellate review of her claimed error by failing to brief how the issue of
notice relates to the viability of her causes of action. Mitcham v Detroit, 355 Mich 182, 203; 94
NW2d 388 (1959).
Affirmed.
/s/ Jane E. Markey
/s/ Martin M. Doctoroff
/s/ Michael R. Smolenski
-1
-2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
