IN RE HEIDI ANDREWS MINORS
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MICHIGAN
COURT OF APPEALS
__________________________________________
In the Matter of HEIDI ANDREWS, AMANDA
ANDREWS and JAMIE ANDREWS, Minors.
FAMILY INDEPENDENCE AGENCY,
UNPUBLISHED
June 20, 1997
Petitioner-Appellee,
v
No. 200099
Clinton Probate Court
LC No. 96-004726-NA
PAMELA ANDREWS,
Respondent-Appellant.
Before: Gage, P.J., and Reilly and Hoekstra, JJ.
MEMORANDUM.
Respondent appeals as of right from the probate court order terminating her parental rights to
the minor children under MCL 712A.19b(3)(b)(ii), (c)(i), (g) and (j); MSA
27.3178(598.19b)(3)(b)(ii), (c)(i), (g) and (j). We affirm.
The probate court did not clearly err in finding that the statutory grounds for termination were
established by clear and convincing evidence. MCR 5.974(I); In re Miller, 433 Mich 331, 337; 445
NW2d 161 (1989). Further, respondent failed to show that termination of her parental rights was
clearly not in the children’s best interests. In re Hall-Smith, ___ Mich App ___; ___ NW2d ___
(Docket No. 195833, issued 3/25/97), slip op p 3. Thus, the probate court did not err in terminating
respondent’s parental rights to the children. MCL 712A.19b(5); MSA 27.3178(598.19b)(5).
Affirmed.
/s/ Hilda R. Gage
/s/ Maureen P. Reilly
/s/ Joel P. Hoekstra
-1
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.