ROBERT M LIGGETT V BARRY VANDERWALL

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N C O U R T O F A P P E A L S ROBERT M. LIGGETT and RHONDA C. LOCKWOOD, UNPUBLISHED January 21, 1997 Plaintiffs–Appellants, v No. 178637 LC No. 93-030661-NZ BARRY VANDERWALL, Defendant–Appellee. Before: Doctoroff, C.J., and Wahls and Smolenski, JJ. MEMORANDUM. Plaintiff appeals as of right from the circuit court’s August 25, 1994 order which determined the extent to which plaintiff would be allowed to construct or maintain a private road over an easement on defendant’s property. We affirm. The exact terms of the circuit court order were provided by written stipulation of both parties on August 24, 1995. Since plaintiff’s counsel stipulated to the width of the existing roadway and the extent to which plaintiff would be allowed to preserve and maintain that roadway, plaintiff may not now argue that the circuit court erred in regard to those terms. Living Alternatives v Dep’t of Mental Health, 207 Mich App 482, 484; 525 NW2d 466 (1994), Detroit v Larned Associates, 199 Mich App 36, 38; 501 NW2d 189 (1993). Affirmed. /s/ Martin M. Doctoroff /s/ Myron H. Wahls /s/ Michael R. Smolenski -1

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.