PEOPLE OF MI V JACK C ROBINSON
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MICHIGAN
COURT OF APPEALS
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,
UNPUBLISHED
December 30, 1996
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v
No. 187194
LC No. 94-133200
JACK C. ROBINSON,
Defendant-Appellant.
Before: McDonald, P.J., and Bandstra and C.L. Bosman,* JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Defendant was initially charged with two counts of second-degree criminal sexual conduct
(CSC II), MCL 750.520c(1)(a); MSA 28.788(3)(1)(a). Following a bench trial, defendant was
convicted of assault with intent to commit CSC II, MCL 750.520g(2); MSA 28.788(7)(2). He was
sentenced to two years’ probation. Defendant now appeals as of right. We reverse.
Defendant argues that the trial court’s verdicts of not guilty of CSC II but guilty of assault with
intent to commit CSC II were inconsistent. We agree. Criminal verdicts in a jury trial need not be
consistent because juries possess the capacity for leniency and are not held to any rules of logic.
People v Burgess, 419 Mich 305, 310; 353 NW2d 444 (1984). However, “[t]hese considerations
change when a case is tried by a judge sitting without a jury.” Id. In addition, an appellate court does
not normally enjoy the freedom to be inconsistent or to compromise. Id. at 310-311.
MCL 750.520c; MSA 28.788(3) provides in relevant part:
(1) A person is guilty of criminal sexual conduct in the second degree if the
person engages in sexual contact with another person and if any of the following
circumstances exists:
(a) That other person is under 13 years of age.
* Circuit judge, sitting on the Court of Appeals by assignment.
-1
“Sexual contact” includes the intentional touching of the victim’s intimate parts if that intentional touching
can reasonably be construed as being for the purpose of sexual arousal or gratification. MCL
750.520a(k); MSA 28.788(1)(k).
The court acquitted defendant of CSC II, but found him guilty of assault with intent to commit
CSC II. MCL 750.520g(2); MSA 28.788(7)(2). The elements of assault with intent to commit CSC
II require an assault, involving the use of force or coercion, with the specific intent to touch the victim’s
genital area, groin, inner thigh, buttock, breast, or clothing covering those areas, for the purpose of
sexual arousal or sexual gratification. People v Evans, 173 Mich App 631, 634; 434 NW2d 452
(1988).
We conclude that the trial court’s verdict of guilty with regard to the assault conviction was
inconsistent with its finding of fact that defendant’s touching of the victim was not done for a sexual
purpose, thereby requiring the dismissal of the CSC II charges. The court stated that it believed the
testimony of the victim that defendant touched her breasts and genitals while purportedly washing her.
Thus, the court rejected defendant’s testimony that he did not touch or bathe the victim. The court
stated, for purposes of the CSC II charges, that it could not find beyond a reasonable doubt that
defendant had a sexual purpose in touching the victim. The court then articulated the elements of assault
with intent to commit CSC II by reading from CJI2d 20.18 and found that defendant assaulted the
victim “for the purpose of sexual gratification and/or arousal.” This finding cannot be harmonized with
the court’s initial finding that defendant touched the victim, but not with a sexual purpose.
Defendant’s assault conviction is reversed because it was inconsistent with the court’s initial
finding of fact that the prosecution did not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant acted with
an illegal sexual purpose. We leave the question of double jeopardy for resolution in the trial court if
there is further prosecution. People v Fairbanks, 165 Mich App 551, 557, n 2; 419 NW2d 13
(1987).
We reverse.
/s/ Gary R. McDonald
/s/ Richard A. Bandstra
/s/ Calvin L. Bosman
-2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.