PEOPLE OF MI V RICHARD NORMAN MAGANA

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, UNPUBLISHED September 20, 1996 Plaintiff-Appellee, v No. 166749 LC No. 91-002347 AFTER REMAND RICHARD NORMAN MAGANA, Defendant-Appellant. Before: Markman, P.J., and Murphy and Hoekstra, JJ. PER CURIAM. In an unpublished per curiam opinion issued April 23, 1996, we affirmed defendant’s sentence, remanded the case to the trial court for consideration as to whether defendant had been entrapped under the test set forth in People v Juillet, 439 Mich 34; 475 NW2d 786 (1991), and retained jurisdiction. After remand proceedings consistent with our prior opinion, this matter has been resubmitted to this panel. We now affirm defendant’s conviction. On remand, the trial court ruled, in a lengthy, well-written opinion, that defendant was not entrapped. We review this decision under the clearly erroneous standard. People v Fabiano, 192 Mich App 523, 526; 482 NW2d 467 (1992). Based on the evidence presented, we find no clear error in the trial court’s ruling. Defendant’s conviction and sentence are affirmed. Affirmed. /s/ Stephen J. Markman /s/ William B. Murphy /s/ Joel P. Hoekstra -1

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.