PEOPLE OF MI V WILBERT GLEN DOBSON JR

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N C O U R T O F A P P E A L S PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, UNPUBLISHED August 13, 1996 Plaintiff-Appellee, v No. 182175 LC Nos. 93-008208-FH; 93-008210-FH; 94-008207-FH WILBERT GLEN DOBSON, JR., a/k/a WILBERT GLENN DOBSON, JR., Defendant-Appellant. _______________________________________ Before: Kavanagh, T.G.,* P.J., and R.B. Burns** and G.S. Allen,** JJ. MEMORANDUM. Pursuant to a plea agreement, defendant pleaded guilty to three counts of delivery of less than fifty grams of cocaine, MCL 333.7401(2)(a)(iv); MSA 14.15(7401)(2)(a)(iv), and was sentenced to three consecutive terms of 3-1/3 to 20 years’ imprisonment. He appeals as of right. We affirm. This case has been decided without oral argument pursuant to MCR 7.214(A). The trial court did not clearly err in finding that defendant was not entrapped. People v Kent, 194 Mich App 206; 486 NW2d 110 (1992). Moreover, defendant has not shown that he was denied effective assistance of trial counsel. In re Oakland Co Prosecutor, 191 Mich App 113; 477 NW2d 455 (1991). Next, defendant’s sentences does not violate the principle of proportionality. People v Milbourn, 435 Mich 630; 461 NW2d 1 (1990). Finally, MCL 333.7401(3); MSA 14.15(7401)(3) requires that defendant receive consecutive sentences for his convictions. People v Morris, 450 Mich *Former Supreme Court Justice, sitting on the Court of Appeals by assignment pursuant to Administrative Order 1996-3. **Former Court of Appeals Judges, sitting on the Court of Appeals by assignment pursuant to Administrative Order 1996-3. -1­ 316; 537 NW2d 842 (1995). The term “another felony” as used in MCL 333.7401(3); MSA 14.15(7401)(3) includes defendant’s multiple cocaine delivery offenses for which he simultaneously convicted and sentenced in these cases. Id. Affirmed. /s/ Thomas G. Kavanagh /s/ Robert B. Burns /s/ Glenn S. Allen, Jr. -2­

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.