GAVINO R PICCIONE V LYLE A GILLETTE (Concurring Opinion)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS MARIO PICCIONE, as next friend of GAVINO R. PICCIONE, a minor, FOR PUBLICATION January 17, 2019 Plaintiff-Appellant, v LYLE A. GILLETTE and PLUMBER’S PORTABLE TOILET SERVICE, No. 342826 Kent Circuit Court LC No. 17-002385-NI Defendants-Appellees. Before: MARKEY, P.J., and M. J. KELLY and SWARTZLE, JJ. MARKEY, P.J. and SWARTZLE, J. (concurring). We concur in the per curiam opinion. This case is factually analogous to Neci v Steel, 488 Mich 971; 790 NW2d 828 (2010). For reasons similar to those set out by Justice Young in his concurring opinion in Neci, we conclude that binding precedent compels reversal and remand in this case. /s/ Jane E. Markey /s/ Brock A. Swartzle

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.