AMY SHEMANSKI V JAMES FRANCES LEGROW
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MICHIGAN
COURT OF APPEALS
JESSICA LEWIS,
FOR PUBLICATION
August 21, 2003
9:05 a.m.
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v
No. 234723
Genesee Circuit Court
LC No. 99-066423-NZ
JAMES FRANCES LEGROW,
Defendant-Appellant.
BETHANY L. DENNIS,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v
No. 234726
Genesee Circuit Court
LC No. 99-066668-NZ
JAMES FRANCES LEGROW,
Defendant-Appellant.
AMY SHEMANSKI,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v
No. 234727
Genesee Circuit Court
LC No. 00-066945-NZ
JAMES FRANCES LEGROW,
Defendant-Appellant.
Updated Copy
October 10, 2003
Before: Markey, P.J., and Cavanagh and Hoekstra, JJ.
HOEKSTRA, J., (concurring).
I agree with the majority opinion in all respects, except with regard to certain portions of
section IV, which addresses the trial court's evidentiary decisions. Despite my disagreement
concerning the relevancy of certain evidence, I concur, however, in the majority's result because
-1-
I believe that declining to grant relief is not inconsistent with substantial justice. MCR 2.613(A);
Chastain v Gen Motors Corp, 467 Mich 888; 654 NW2d 326 (2002); Miller v Hensley, 244 Mich
App 528, 531; 624 NW2d 582 (2001).
/s/ Joel P. Hoekstra
-2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
