PEOPLE OF MI V RODNEY RAY ARMSTRONG

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, FOR PUBLICATION September 14, 2001 9:00 a.m. Plaintiff-Appellee, v No. 230304 Genesee Circuit Court LC No. 00-006239-FH RODNEY RAY ARMSTRONG, Defendant-Appellant. Updated Copy December 7, 2001 Before: Wilder, P.J., and Hood and Griffin, JJ. PER CURIAM. Defendant appeals by delayed leave granted from an eight-to-fifteen-year sentence imposed for a conviction of second-degree criminal sexual conduct (CSC). MCL 750.520c. We affirm but remand for completion of a guidelines departure form. This appeal is being decided without oral argument pursuant to MCR 7.214(E)(1)(b). Defendant's sole claim on appeal is that his minimum sentence, which represents a fourfold increase of the highest minimum sentence under the guidelines, violated the principle of proportionality under People v Milbourn, 435 Mich 630, 636; 461 NW2d 1 (1990). We review for an abuse of discretion the trial court's decision that objective and verifiable factors constitute substantial and compelling reasons for departing from the guidelines' recommended minimum sentence. People v Fields, 448 Mich 58, 69-70; 528 NW2d 176 (1995); People v Babcock, 244 Mich App 64, 75-76; 624 NW2d 479 (2000). The instant offense was committed in May 2000, making it subject to the statutory sentencing guidelines. MCL 769.34(2); People v Reynolds, 240 Mich App 250, 253; 611 NW2d 316 (2000). Second-degree CSC is a class C felony subject to a fifteen-year maximum sentence. MCL 750.520c(2); 777.16y. The guidelines, as scored, placed defendant in the A-IV category, which provides for a minimum sentence range of twelve to twenty-four months. MCL 777.64. The court must impose a minimum sentence within the guidelines range unless a departure from the guidelines is permitted. MCL 769.34(2). The court may depart from the guidelines if it "has a substantial and compelling reason for that departure and states on the record the reasons for departure." MCL 769.34(3). The court may depart from the guidelines for nondiscriminatory reasons where there are legitimate factors not considered by the guidelines or where factors considered by the guidelines have been given inadequate or disproportionate weight. MCL -1- 769.34(3)(a), (b); People v Castillo, 230 Mich App 442, 448; 584 NW2d 606 (1998). See also People v Nelson, 234 Mich App 454, 464; 594 NW2d 114 (1999). Defendant has an uncontrollable sexual attraction toward little boys, apparently as a result of his history of sexual abuse. The trial court did not err in finding that this is a factor not adequately considered by the guidelines. People v Brzezinski (After Remand), 196 Mich App 253, 255-256; 492 NW2d 781 (1992). The trial court also did not err in finding that the need to protect other children by the sentence imposed is another factor not adequately considered by the guidelines. People v Miller, 165 Mich App 32, 51; 418 NW2d 668 (1987). Further, the guidelines take into account psychological injury to the victim requiring therapy, MCL 777.34, but do not take into account the violation of the victim's parents' trust in defendant, the effect on the family occasioned by the victim's loss of trust in all men, including his own father, or the effect on the victim and his sister from having to learn about sexual matters at such a young age. We also note that the prosecutor's decision, in exchange for defendant's guilty plea, to dismiss a charge of first-degree CSC, which carries a potential life sentence, and the fact that defendant was not charged with attempted CSC for trying to have the victim perform oral sex on him are additional factors that the court can consider when deciding whether departure is warranted. People v Williams, 223 Mich App 409, 411; 593 NW2d 560 (1997); People v Coulter (After Remand), 205 Mich App 453, 456; 517 NW2d 827 (1994); Brzezinski, supra at 256. Therefore, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in finding substantial and compelling reasons for departing upward from the guidelines. Although the trial court articulated its reasons for the departure on the record, it failed to complete a guidelines departure form as required. People v Fleming, 428 Mich 408, 428; 410 NW2d 266 (1987); People v Bennett, 241 Mich App 511, 516; 616 NW2d 703 (2000). Accordingly, we remand for completion of that ministerial task. Affirmed but remanded for completion of a guidelines departure form. We do not retain jurisdiction. /s/ Kurtis T. Wilder /s/ Harold Hood /s/ Richard Allen Griffin -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.