IN RE JACKSON (Order)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Court of Appeals, State of Michigan ORDER Colleen A. O'Brien Presiding Judge In re Jackson Docket No. 339724 Mark T. Boonstra LC No. 09-003770-01-FC Thomas C. Cameron Judges Consistent with our opinion released today, the motion to waive fees is DENIED because MCL 600.2963 mandates that a prisoner pursuing a civil action be liable for the filing fees. Plaintiff is not required to pay an initial partial fee. However, for this complaint to be filed, plaintiff shall submit a copy of this order and refile the pleading within 21 days of the date of this order. By doing this, plaintiff becomes responsible for paying the $375 filing fee and the $25 electronic filing system fee, for a total of $400, and, generally, may not file another new civil appeal or original action in this Court until such time that either the Department of Corrections remits or plaintiff pays the entire outstanding balance due. MCL 600.2963(8). The electronic filing system fee applies to the filing of a civil action even if it is not filed electronically. MCL 600.1986(2). Failure to comply with this order shall result in the complaint not being filed in this Court and plaintiff not being responsible for paying the filing fee. If plaintiff timely refiles the pleadings, monthly payments shall be made to the Department of Corrections in an amount of 50 percent of the deposits made to plaintiffs account until the payments equal the balance due of $400. This amount shall then be remitted to this Court. Again, generally, plaintiff may not file either a new civil appeal or an original action until plaintiff pays the entire outstanding balance due. MCL 600.2963(8). The Clerk of this Court shall furnish two copies of this order to plaintiff and return plaintiffs initial pleading, i.e. , his complaint for superintending control filed on August 16, 2017, with this order. A true copy entered and certified by Jerome W. Zimmer Jr. , Chief Clerk, on DEC 2 7 21118 Date

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.