BARBARA E. JONES, individually and as administratrix, vs. WILLIAM W. RUSSEL & another.

Annotate this Case

BARBARA E. JONES, individually and as administratrix, [Note 1] vs. WILLIAM W. RUSSEL & another. [Note 2]

349 Mass. 761

June 3, 1965

Exceptions overruled. On conflicting evidence as to who was the lessee under a written lease and from the failure of the defendant lessors, in whose custody the lease had been, to produce it at the trial, the jury could find, as testified, that the plaintiff's mother-in-law was the lessee, to whom no notice to quit for nonpayment of rent had been given. They could also find that the plaintiff was

Page 762

an occupant of the premises with the lessee's assent. The defendants thus owed her the duty of reasonable care in maintaining a common stairway. There was evidence of the defendants' negligence. There was no error in denying the defendants' motions for a directed verdict and for a new trial.

FOOTNOTES

[Note 1] Administratrix of the estate of Joseph Jones, an existing viable child.

[Note 2] Nancy R. Roney, both as trustees of Wesley Realty Trust.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.