Commonwealth v. Moffat
Annotate this Case
The Supreme Judicial Court affirmed the trial judge’s denial of Defendant’s motion for postconviction testing of evidence, holding that thad Defendant failed to establish, by a preponderance of the evidence, that his motion met the requirements of Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 278A, 7(b)(3) and (4).
Defendant sought testing of four cigarette butts collected by investigators near the crime scene. The trial judge found that Defendant failed to meet his burden under Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 178A, 7(b) to establish that a reasonably effective defense attorney would have sought testing of the evidence, and that DNA testing had the potential to result in evidence material to the identity of the perpetrator. The Supreme Judicial Court affirmed, holding that the trial judge did not abuse her discretion in denying Defendant’s motion.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.