Commonwealth v. Ramos
Annotate this CaseDefendant was indicted on a charge of receiving a stolen motor vehicle. Defendant moved to suppress evidence seized as a result of a warrantless search of his garage. A superior court judge denied the motion. After a joint trial of Defendant and his codefendant, Defendant was convicted. The Supreme Judicial Court affirmed, holding (1) the superior court judge did not err in denying Defendant’s motion to suppress, as the warrantless entry into the garage was justified by exigent circumstances; (2) the trial court did not err in admitting recordings of jailhouse telephone calls between Defendant and his codefendant; and (3) the evidence was sufficient to support Defendant’s conviction.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.