LORANGER CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION vs. THE E. F. HAUSERMAN COMPANY.
Annotate this CaseROSE MARIE LONGO (NOW NOLAN) vs. BOARD OF ASSESSORS OF THE CITY OF MEDFORD (and four companion cases). [Note 1]
1 Mass. App. Ct. 801
January 17, 1973
These
Page 802
appeals to the Supreme Judicial Court from decisions of the Appellate Tax Board (board) were transferred to this court under the provisions of G. L. c. 211, Section 4A, as amended, and G. L. c. 211A, Sections 10 and 12. The skeletal records before us do not disclose any question of law which may have been raised before the board. If we accept the factual assertions in the appellants' briefs, no error of law is made to appear.
Decisions of the Appellate Tax Board affirmed.
FOOTNOTES
[Note 1] Two of the companion cases are by Athos V. Longo, trustee, against the Board of Assessors of the City of Malden, one is by Francis and Rose Marie Nolan against the Board of Assessors of the City of Medford, and one is by Mary Longo against the latter board.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.