Benjamin L. Yap v. Alyssa L. Vinton (Errata)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Errata. Go to corrected Opinion
Download PDF
MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Reporter of Decisions Decision: 2016 ME 58 Docket: Oxf-15-373 Submitted On Briefs: January 28, 2016 Decided: April 14, 2016 Corrected: September 1, 2016 Panel: ALEXANDER, MEAD, GORMAN, JABAR, HJELM, and HUMPHREY, JJ. BENJAMIN L. YAP v. ALYSSA L. VINTON ERRATA SHEET The per curiam opinion of this Court certified on April 14, 2016 is amended as follows: The third sentence of [¶10] is changed to read: “[A] key question on review, when draft orders are adopted without change or with little material change, will be whether the findings and order reflect the application of judgment by the court and not simply one of the parties.” Id. (alteration in original) (quotation marks omitted). Id. The original per curiam on the Judicial Branch website has been replaced with the per curiam opinion as corrected.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
