Hero v. Macomber
Annotate this CaseIn 2014, Husband and Wife were divorced pursuant to a divorce judgment that incorporated the terms of a mutual agreement between the properties. In 2015, Wife filed a motion to enforce a provision of the judgment requiring the sale of certain real property in a commercially reasonable manner. At the conclusion of a hearing, the district court granted Wife’s motion to enforce. The Supreme Judicial Court affirmed, holding (1) the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Husband’s motion for a continuance; (2) the court properly granted a motion for an expedited hearing; and (3) sufficient evidence in the record supported the court’s finding that the sale of the real property was commercially reasonable.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.