State v. Vultee
Annotate this CaseAfter a jury trial, Defendant was convicted of several counts of unlawful sexual contact, criminal attempt, visual sexual aggression against a child, sexual misconduct with a child under twelve, and unlawful sexual touching. Defendant appealed, arguing that the superior court erred in admitting and excluding various pieces of evidence and in denying his motion for a new trial. The Supreme Judicial Court affirmed, holding (1) the admission of approximately forty specific statements from each of the State’s witnesses’ testimony was not obvious error; and (2) Defendant’s remaining contentions were similarly without merit.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.