State v. Flynn
Annotate this CaseAfter a jury trial, Defendant was convicted of theft by unauthorized taking or transfer. The Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of conviction, holding (1) the evidence was sufficient to support the theft conviction; (2) the trial court did not err in admitting into evidence several emails between Defendant and representatives of the named victims; (3) no advice-of-counsel instruction should have been given, and any error in the actual instruction given was harmless; (4) the trial court did not err in denying Defendant’s motion for a bill of particulars; and (5) the indictment in this case was not duplicitous and was properly charged.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.