King v. King
Annotate this CaseWife filed a complaint for divorce from Husband in 2010. Upon the filing of the divorce complaint, an injunction automatically issued barring either party from transferring marital property without the written consent of the parties or the permission of the court. Despite the outstanding injunction, Husband transferred certain marital assets to third parties. The district court later entered a judgment finding Husband committed financial misconduct through his criminal activity and by distributing assets during the divorce in violation of the court's injunction. The court also determined the parental rights and responsibilities as to the child of the marriage and distributed what remained of the marital estate. Wife appealed. The Supreme Court vacated the district court's judgment because it did not address Husband's responsibility for child support. Remanded with directions for the court to review its entire judgment to ensure that the judgment reflected an equitable resolution of the financial disputes between the parties in light of Husband's apparent violation of the court's financial preliminary injunction.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.