State v. Milne
Annotate this CaseFollowing a jury-waived trial, Daniel Milne was convicted of eluding an officer, passing a roadblock, operating a vehicle after suspension, and driving to endanger. Milne appealed, contending that the evidence was insufficient to support the court's finding him guilty, beyond a reasonable doubt, of the charges of eluding an officer and passing a roadblock. The Supreme Court (1) affirmed Milne's conviction for eluding an officer, and (2) vacated Milne's conviction for passing a roadblock, holding that the available evidence in the record was insufficient to support a finding, beyond a reasonable doubt, that Milne committed the offense where there was no clearly identifiable police roadblock requiring vehicles to stop. Remanded for reconsideration of sentence.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.