Sablock v. Modern Structures Painting
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MAINE CUMBERLAND, ss. SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO. CV JJ- ~o, PATRICIA SABLOCK, Plaintiff ORDER V. MODERN STRUCTURES PAINTING, JOHN RICHARDS, Defendants Before the court are Plaintiffs request for default and Defendant's Motion for Entry of Late Responsive Pleadings. The Complaint arises out of a dispute over renovations at the Plaintiffs home. The Complaint alleges Plaintiff had a contract with Modem Structures Painting LLC ("MSP"). Jolm Richards is the sole member. The Complaint names both MSP and Richards as Defendants. The Complaint was served on the Defendants on October 20, 2022. On November 10, the Plaintiffs requested that the clerk enter a default. The court has not yet acted on that because on the same date, Jolm Richards filed a Motion for Entry of Late Responsive Pleadings and an Answer and Counterclaim. The court waited to see if there was a response to the Defendants motion. No response has been filed and Richards represented he copied Plaintiffs counsel with the motion. There being no response, the motion is granted. There is one issue with the motion that the court should address. Because he is not an attorney, Mr. Richard is barred from by Maine law from representing a corporation. 14 M.R.S §807(1). Therefore, unless Richards meets one ofthe exceptions to the statute, he cannot represent MSP. One exception allows an officer of the corporation to defend a civil action against a Maine corporation that has 5 or fewer shareholders. 4 M.R.S. §807(3)(J)(emphasis supplied). The 1 provision does not specifically apply to a sole member limited liability corporation. Not having heard from the parties on the issue, the court does not determine at this time whether the exception applies to a sole member limited liability corporation. The court does point out, however, that the statute only applies to a corporation that is defending a civil action. Here, Richards has filed a counterclaim on behalf of MSP. By filing a counterclaim, MSP is bringing a separate claim of relief and must retain counsel. Carey v. Indian Rock Corp., 2005 ME 6, !r'3 (Me. 2005). Without counsel, the counterclaim will be dismissed. Id. The court orders as follows: The Motion for Entry of Late Responsive Pleadings is GRANTED. The clerk will not enter a default and any objection to the timeliness of Defendants' Answer is waived. Defendant MSP will either retain counsel or show cause why the counterclaim should not be dismissed by January 15. Either party may submit argument on whether John Richards may represent MSP on the defence of Plaintiffs Complaint by Jan 15. If Richards retains counsel, the issue is moot. This Order is incorporated on the docket by reference pursuant to M.R.Civ.P. 79(a). DATE: fl/ /!fl/ Le Thomas R. McKeon Justice, Maine Superior Court 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
