Spickler V. Dominick
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MAINE SUPERIOR COURT Sagadahoc, ss. Docket No. BATSC-RE-11-0J7 /. AJ\1\#f ---SAC:,- :?j~&;WIL ROBERT SPICKLER Plaintiff v. OLIVER DOMINICK Defendant ORDER This civil action came before the court for a discovery conference. Plaintiff Robert Spickler participated pro se. Defendant Oliver Dominick was absent but appeared through his attorney, Frederick Moore, Esq. There was discussion about pending discovery and scheduling depositions. The court requested, and the parties agreed, that the parties will cooperate in scheduling depositions and in conducting other discovery. On February 24, 2012, Mr. Spickler filed a Motion Seeking Equal Treatment During Court Procedures. The court advised him that such a motion was unnecessary because he had the same right to fair and equal treatment as any other party, but indicated that the motion would be granted because to deny it might imply otherwise. Defendant did not object. Also, the court raised the question whether this case and another civil action in this court, Parker Head Association v. Spickler, Docket No. BATSC-CV-11-13, should be consolidated or at least scheduled together. The parties agreed to discuss that question. Mr. Spickler advised that he intends to ask attorney David Hirshon, who represents Mr. Spickler in the other case, to enter an appearance in this case as well. As a result of the foregoing, it is hereby ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: 1. 2. 3. Defendant's Motion for Protection is dismissed because it was filed without prior authorization under M.R. Civ. P. 26(g)(1). Plaintiffs Motion Seeking Equal Treatment During Court Procedures is granted. The parties will cooperate in scheduling depositions and in other forms of discovery as well. With regard to Plaintiffs request to take the deposition ofthe Defendant, Defendant's counsel will provide Plaintiff forthwith with at least five dates on which Defendant and his counsel are available, and Plaintiff will forthwith either notifY the Defendant's attorney which of those dates Plaintiff is selecting for Defendant's deposition or, if the Plaintiff is not available on any of the proffered dates, request another five dates. This process will continue until a mutually agreeable date for Defendant's deposition to be taken is established. - Pursuant to M.R. Civ. reference in the docket. directed to incorporate this order by Date: 6 March 2012 Justice, Superior Court 2 ROBERT D SPICKLER - PLAINTIFF 25 ROCK LEDGE DRIVE PHIPPSBURG ME 04562 SUPERIOR COURT SAGADAHOC, ss. Docket No BATSC-RE-2011-00027 vs OLIVER DOMINICK - DEFENDANT 132 CAPTAIN JOHN PARKER RD PHIPPSBURG ME 04562 Attorney for: OLIVER DOMINICK FREDERICK MOORE - LIMITED SCHULTE & MOORE 511 CONGRESS STREET SUITE 805 PORTLAND ME 04101 Filing Document: COMPLAINT Filing Date: 10/17/2011 DOCKET RECORD Minor Case Type: OTHER REAL ESTATE
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
