State of Maine V. Lynch
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
~,.!., STATE OF MAINE CUMBERLAND, ss. !',;) l:,:J UNIFIED CRIMINAL DOCKET Docket No. CR-11-588? I. I K.. - cv.Jn - I ;)I I a.._I CiA<) II 1'1i 0 I-"' I-"' e..M !:J STATE OF MAINE :.;::: !-" ,...,;) c:; C> v. ERIC LYNCH Defendant ) ) ) ) ) ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTS TWO AND FOUR ) ) The Defendant Eric Lynch seeks to dismiss two of the domestic violence charges against him on the ground that the alleged victim of Counts 2 and 4, Christina Victor, the adult child of alleged victim Denise Lynch, does not fall within the scope of "family or household member" as defined by 19-A M.R.S.A. § 4002(4). Defendant is charged with Domestic Violence Assault, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 207A(1)(A) against his wife, Denise (Count 1), and against Denise's daughter, Christina (Count 2), as well as with Domestic Violence Criminal Threatening, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 209-A(1)(A) against both Denise (Count 3) and Christina (Count 4). Sections 207-A and 209-A expressly reference the definition of "family or household member" set forth in 19-A M.R.S.A. § 4002(4). See 17-A M.R.S.A. § 207-A(l)(A) & 209-A(1)(A) ("A person is guilty of domestic violence assault [criminal threatening] if "[t]he person violates section 207 [209] and the victim is a family or household member as defined in Title 19A section 4002, subsection 4. Violation of this paragraph is a Class D crime"). According to the definition set forth, for purposes of the charged offenses, 1 "family or household members" include: ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ 1 spouses or domestic partners; former spouses or former domestic partners; individuals presently living together as spouses; individuals formerly living together as spouses; natural parents of the same child; adult household members related by consanguinity or affinity; minor children of a household member when the defendant 1s an adult household member; individuals presently living together; The categories listed above as the last four, ie., individuals presently or formerly living together and current or former sexual partners, are considered within the definition of "family or household members" only with respect to the protection from abuse chapter, the domestic violence statutes (17-A M.R.S.A. §§ 207-A, 209-A, 210-B, 210-C, 211-A), and for purposes of 17-A M.R.S.A. §§ 15, 1201, 1202 & 1253. See 19-A M.R.S.A. § 4002(4). ¢ ¢ ¢ individuals formerly living together; individuals who are sexual partners; individuals who were formerly sexual partners. 19-A M.R.S.A. § 4002(4) (emphasis added). The court held a brief hearing on this issue on December 6, 2011. At the hearing, Defendant conceded that during some of the time that he lived with Denise, her daughter Christina lived there too. The court heard undisputed testimony that Defendant lived with Denise and Christina for "at least three years." Accordingly, because Defendant and Christina were formerly part of the same household, they fall within the plain language of § 4002's "individuals formerly living together" -- a category expressly included within the definition of "family or household members" for purposes of the domestic violence offenses charged. Accordingly, because the Defendant and his stepdaughter Christina Victor constitute "family or household members" as charged in the offenses set forth in Counts 2 and 4, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. DATED: lc}-hqJ \\ ---=~,~+\~------ 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
