State of Maine v. Keel
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MAINE CUMBERLAND, ss STATE OF MAINE v. ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS ALONZA KEEL, Defendant The defendant argues that the consent to search apartment 409 at 240 Harvard Street in Portland on May 16, 2007 was tainted and all evidence obtained should be suppressed. The findings of fact made at the conclusion of the hearing are incorporated into this order by reference. For the following reasons, the motion to suppress is denied. The defendant is charged with three counts of possession of illegal drugs allegedly found during the search at the Harvard street residence. The defendant has standing to challenge the search. See State v. Thibodeau, 317 A.2d 172, 176 (Me. 1974). A search conducted after a valid consent is obtained is an exception to the warrant requirement. State v. Seamen's Club, 1997 ME 70, ~ 7, 691 A.2d 1248, 1251. Michelle Boucher's consent was valid. Further, she had sufficient apparent authority to consent to the search of the residence. See Georgia v. Randolph, 547 U.s. 103, 110-11 (2006); State v. Thibodeau, 317 A.2d 172, 177-78 (Me. 1974). The defendant signed the bail bond, which provided that he resided at the Harvard Street address and that he would submit to random searches of his person, vehicle and residence. consent to [the] search." He presented no evidence that the bail condition is unreasonable in this case. See State's Ex. 1; State v. Dllring, 1999 "ME 183, 11 12, 19, 27, 741 A.2d 1065, 1068, 1071, 1073. The entry is The Defendant's Motion to Suppress is DENIED. Date: February 26,2008 ancy Mills Justice, Superior Court A True Copy Attest . Ii I! Clerk 2 /1 /_(~ --d.w:I. U J/\)()a I r. of ...ourts
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
