LESLIE RENEE BOAGNI ELSBURY VERSUS ERNEST RAY ELSBURY, IV Vs.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT P.O. Box 16577 Lake Charles LA 70616 (337) 433-9403 NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION Jack Derrick Miller Attorney at Law P. O. Drawer 1650 Crowley LA 70526 Nicole B. Breaux Attorney at Law 415 N. Parkerson Ave. Crowley LA 70527-1650 Matthew H. Long Jack Derrick Miller, APC PO Drawer 1650 Crowley LA 70526 Judgment on rehearing rendered and mailed to all parties or counsel of record on April 3, 2024 REHEARING ACTION: April 3, 2024 Docket Number: 23 00323-CA LESLIE RENEE BOAGNI ELSBURY VERSUS ERNEST RAY ELSBURY, IV Appealed from Lafayette Parish Case No. 20172013 BEFORE JUDGES: Hon. D. Kent Savoie Hon. Candyce G. Perret Hon. Ledricka J. Thierry As counsel of record in the captioned case, you are hereby notified that the application for rehearing filed by Ernest Ray Elsbury, IV has this day been GRANTED. (See majority opinion on rehearing also rendered this date) cc: Leslie Renee Boagni Elsbury, In Proper Person NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION ON REHEARING STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 23-323 LESLIE RENEE BOAGNI ELSBURY VERSUS ERNEST RAY ELSBURY, IV ********** APPEAL FROM THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF LAFAYETTE, NO. 20172013 HONORABLE LAURIE A. HULIN, DISTRICT JUDGE ********** CANDYCE G. PERRET JUDGE ********** Court composed of D. Kent Savoie, Candyce G. Perret, and Ledricka J. Thierry, Judges. REHEARING GRANTED. Leslie Renee Boagni 5042 North University Avenue Carencro, LA 70520 (337) 224-0317 COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE: In Proper Person Jack Derrick Miller Nicole B. Breaux Matthew H. Long 415 North Parkerson Avenue Crowley, LA 70527-1650 (337) 788-0768 COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT/APPELLEE/CROSS-APPELLANT: Ernest Ray Elsbury, IV PERRET, Judge. In our original opinion, we found no merit to Mr. Elsbury’s answer to the appeal seeking $11,559.79 for his attorney fees incurred between the date the petition for divorce was filed and the date of the judgment of divorce. Specifically, we found that “[a]lthough Mr. Elsbury submitted Exhibit E-20, which includes his attorney fees through December 10, 2017, and testified at trial that the attorney fees amounted to $23,119.59, he failed to place any claim for reimbursement at issue for the trial court to consider.” In the rehearing application, Mr. Elsbury argues that there was a stipulation and exhibit introduced as to the amount of his fees along with his own trial testimony to the amount, without any objection whatsoever. He further argues that Ms. Boagni did not respond to his claim for fees on appeal. Because we find the December 28, 2022 trial court judgment is silent regarding Mr. Elsbury’s request for reimbursement of attorney fees through his divorce with Ms. Boagni in the amount of $11,559.79, and because we find that the trial judge is in the best position to make this determination, we hereby grant his request for rehearing for the limited purpose of remanding this matter to the trial court for it to consider his reimbursement claim for the attorney fees that were incurred between the date the petition for divorce was filed and the date of the judgment of divorce. Our original judgment is otherwise affirmed. REHEARING GRANTED. This opinion is NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. Uniform Rules—Courts of Appeal, Rule 2–16.3.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
