STATE OF LOUISIANA Vs. ROBERT REVOILLEZ SASSP GALLOW

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 21-100 STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS ROBERT GALLOW ************ APPEAL FROM THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF LAFAYETTE, NO. CR 178555 HONORABLE MARILYN CARR CASTLE, DISTRICT JUDGE ************ SHARON DARVILLE WILSON JUDGE ************ Court composed of Billy H. Ezell, Candyce G. Perret, and Sharon Darville Wilson, Judges. APPEAL DISMISSED. DEFENDANTAPPELLANT IS GIVEN FIFTEEN DAYS TO FILE AN APPLICATION FOR SUPERVISORY WRITS. Donald Dale Landry District Attorney – 15th Judicial District Celeste White Assistant District Attorney – 15th Judicial District P. O. Box 3306 Lafayette, LA 70502 (337) 232-5170 COUNSEL FOR APPELLEE: State of Louisiana Annette Fuller Roach Louisiana Appellate Project P. O. Box 1747 Lake Charles, LA 70602-1747 (337) 436-2900 COUNSEL FOR APPELLANT: Robert Gallow WILSON, Judge. On October 5, 2020, Defendant-Appellant, Robert Gallow, was charged by bill of information with domestic violence, in violation of La.R.S. 14:35.3(K); two counts of false imprisonment, in violation of La.R.S. 14:46; resisting arrest, in violation of La.R.S. 14:108; domestic abuse battery, in violation of La.R.S. 14:35.3; and flight from an officer, in violation of La.R.S. 14:108(B)(1)(a). Defendant-Appellant filed a pro se “Motion to Quash” on October 23, 2020, asserting he was arrested on August 5, 2020, and that the time limitations of La.Code Crim.P. arts. 532(7), 581, and 701(B) and (C) had expired. He requested discharge from custody and dismissal of the charges. The trial court denied the motion on October 27, 2020, based on the bill of information having been filed on October 5, 2020. On November 30, 2020, Defendant-Appellant filed a pro se “Motion to Appeal” from the trial court’s October 27, 2020 ruling. The trial court granted an appeal. Defendant-Appellant’s trial counsel filed a “Motion for Release of Defendant [for] Failure to Arraign as Required by La. C.Cr.P. Art. 701B(1) and C” on November 24, 2020. A hearing was held on December 9, 2020. The trial court denied the motion. Counsel for Defendant-Appellant filed a supervisory writ application seeking review of the trial court’s December 9, 2020 ruling. On February 12, 2021, this Court denied Defendant-Appellant’s writ application finding his illegal detention ceased when he was arraigned. On February 2, 2021, this Court issued a “Rule to Show Cause” why Defendant-Appellant’s appeal should not be dismissed as the judgment is not appealable. On February 22, 2021, this Court received appellate counsel’s response to the “Rule to Show Cause,” wherein she concedes the proper mode of review is by supervisory writ application. Defendant-Appellant, Robert Gallow, is hereby permitted to file a proper application for supervisory writs, in compliance with Uniform Rules Courts of Appeal, Rule 4, no later than fifteen days from the date of this decision. Defendant is not required to file a notice of intent to seek writs nor obtain an order setting a return date pursuant to Uniform Rules Courts of Appeal, Rule 4-3, as we hereby construe the motion for appeal as a notice of intent to seek a supervisory writ. APPEAL DISMISSED. DEFENDANT-APPELLANT IS PERMITTED TO FILE AN APPLICATION FOR SUPERVISORY WRITS WITHIN FIFTEEN DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS DECISION. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.