STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS CHARLES BRAD DOSHER A/K/A CHARLES BRADLEY DOSHER Vs.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 20-572 STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS CHARLES BRAD DOSHER A/K/A CHARLES BRADLEY DOSHER ********** APPEAL FROM THE SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF CATAHOULA, NO. 18-0273 HONORABLE JOHN C. REEVES, DISTRICT JUDGE ********** D. KENT SAVOIE JUDGE ********** Court composed of Billy Howard Ezell, D. Kent Savoie, and J. Larry Vidrine*, Judges. CONVICTION AND SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED FOR NEW TRIAL ____________________ *Honorable J. Larry Vidrine participated in this decision by appointment of the Louisiana Supreme Court as Judge Pro Tempore. Karla Shirley-McHand Assistant District Attorney Bradley R. Burget District Attorney Seventh Judicial District 301 Bushley Street, 3rd Floor Harrisonburg, Louisiana 71340 (318) 744-5232 COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF/APPELLEE: State of Louisiana Meghan Harwell Bitoun Louisiana Appellate Project P.O. Box 4252. New Orleans, LA 70119 (504) 470-4779 COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT/APPELLANT: Charles Brad Dosher Charles Brad Dosher MPWY/WAL-3 Louisiana State Prison Angola, LA 70712 DEFENDANT/APPELLANT SAVOIE, Judge. On July 12, 2018, Defendant, Charles B. Dosher, was charged by bill of indictment with the second degree murder of his father, Charles Virgil Dosher, in violation of La.R.S. 14:30.1. The trial court’s docket number for this charge was 18-273. On the same day, Defendant was also indicted under trial court docket number 18-274 with illegal possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, in violation of La.R.S. 14:95.1, as well as under trial court docket number 18-275 for aggravated flight from an officer, in violation of La.R.S. 14:108.1(C). Although all three charges were filed on the same day and were tried together, they were never joined in the lower court. Defendant proceeded to trial on all three charges on October 1, 2019, following a day-long jury selection. On October 4, 2019, the jury returned guilty verdicts on all three counts. Polling of the jury revealed a ten-to-two verdict on the second degree murder charge, an eleven-to-one verdict on the possession of a firearm by a convicted felon charge, and a unanimous verdict on the aggravated flight charge. On November 26, 2019, the trial court sentenced Defendant to life imprisonment without the benefit of probation, parole, or suspension of sentence for second degree murder; twenty years without benefits for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon; and five years for aggravated flight from an officer. Defendant has appealed each of his convictions and sentences and asserts two assignments of error: (1) the convictions for second degree murder and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon are unconstitutional because they were non-unanimous, and (2) the trial court committed a non-harmless error when it instructed the jury that it could convict Defendant with a less than unanimous verdict. As the instant appeal corresponds only to the second degree murder conviction at issue in trial court docket number 18-273, we will address herein only assignment of error number one as it relates to that conviction. 1 For the following reasons, we find that Defendant’s second degree murder conviction should be vacated and remanded to the trial court for a new trial. FACTS Defendant was convicted of the second degree murder of his father following a physical argument on January 28, 2018. ERRORS PATENT In accordance with La.Code Crim.P. art. 920, all appeals are reviewed for errors patent on the face of the record. After reviewing the record, we note that there is an error patent involving the jury’s return of a non-unanimous jury verdict for second degree murder, which is addressed below in accordance with Defendant’s first assignment of error. ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR NUMBER ONE: In this assignment of error, Defendant contends that his ten-to-two guilty verdict is unconstitutional under Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 U.S. ___, 140 S.Ct. 1390 (2020). In Ramos, the Supreme Court ruled that the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution requires that all felony convictions be based upon a unanimous jury verdict. In State v. Wilson, 20-128 (La. 6/3/20), 296 So.3d 1045, Defendant’s appeal of his conviction of illegal possession of a firearm at related sentence is addressed in connection with this court’s docket number 20-573. Defendant’s appeal of his conviction of aggravated flight from an officer and related sentence is addressed in connection with this court’s docket number 20-574. 1 2 the Louisiana supreme court noted that the holding of Ramos applied to all cases that were pending on direct review at the time of the holding. As Defendant’s appeal was pending when Ramos was issued on April 4, 2020, the ruling clearly applies to his case. Indeed, the State has conceded the conviction must be vacated and remanded for a new trial. The holding of Ramos is clear and applies to Defendant’s non-unanimous conviction for second degree murder. As such, Defendant’s conviction and sentence for second degree murder in trial court docket number 18-273 must be vacated and remanded to the trial court for a new trial. DECREE For the reasons set forth herein, Defendant’s conviction and sentence for second degree murder are hereby vacated and the matter is remanded to the trial court for a new trial. CONVICTION AND SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED FOR NEW TRIAL This opinion is NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. Rule 2-16.3, Uniform Rules, Courts of Appeal. 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
