PHILMER JOHNSON, JR., ET AL. VERSUS CITY OF WESTLAKE Vs.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT CW 20-376 consolidated with CW 20-377, CA 20-556, CA 20-557, CW 21-155 & CW 21-156 PHILMER JOHNSON, JR., ET AL. VERSUS CITY OF WESTLAKE ********** APPEAL FROM THE FOURTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF CALCASIEU, NO. 2017-5089 HONORABLE RONALD F. WARE, DISTRICT JUDGE ********** J. LARRY VIDRINE JUDGE ********** Court composed of Billy H. Ezell, D. Kent Savoie, and J. Larry Vidrine , Judges. REVERSED AND RENDERED. _____________________ Honorable J. Larry Vidrine participated in this decision by appointment of the Louisiana Supreme Court as Judge Pro Tempore. J. Michael Veron Peyton F. Pawlicki Veron, Bice, Palermo & Wilson, LLC P.O. Box 2125 Lake Charles, LA 70602-2125 (337) 310-1600 COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT/APPELLEE: City of Westlake Steven Broussard Aaron Broussard Michael Williamson Jason R. Bell Rachel K. Couvillion John Mark Fezio Broussard & Williamson, LLC 1301 Common Street Lake Charles, LA 70601 (337) 439-2450 COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFFS/APPELLANTS: Paula Johnson Marie Moore Philmer Johnson, Jr. Daniel L. Moore Thomas P. Anzelmo, Sr. Lynda Tafaro McCranie, Sistrunk, Anzelmo, Hardy, McDaniel & Welch, L.L.C. 909 Poydras Street, Suite 1000 New Orleans, LA 70112 (504) 831-0946 COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANTS/APPELLEES: OneBeacon Services, LLC Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company Soren E. Gisleson Charles M. King Herman, Herman & Katz 820 O’Keefe Avenue New Orleans, LA 70113 (504) 581-4892 COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFFS/APPELLANTS: Daniel L. Moore Marie Moore Paula Johnson Philmer Johnson, Jr. 2 VIDRINE, Judge Pro Tempore. For the reasons set forth in the case of Daniel L. Moore and Marie Moore v. City of Westlake, 20-556 (La.App. 3 Cir. __/__/____), __So.3d ____, the judgment of the trial court is reversed. We render that the City of Westlake’s ordinances 880882 were legally enacted, not discriminatory, and were reasonable. Costs of this appeal are assessed to Plaintiffs.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
