PATRICK RICHARD, ET AL. Vs. CITGO PETROLEUM CORPORATION, ET AL.

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT CA 18-371 consolidated with CA 18-370, CA 18-372 PATRICK RICHARD, ET AL. VERSUS CITGO PETROLEUM CORPORATION, ET AL. ********** APPEAL FROM THE FOURTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF CALCASIEU, NO. 2007-3392 c/w 2007-2879 and 2007-3052 HONORABLE RONALD F. WARE, DISTRICT JUDGE ********** CANDYCE G. PERRET JUDGE ********** Court composed of John D. Saunders, Billy Howard Ezell, and Candyce G. Perret, Judges. AFFIRMED. Robert E. Landry Kevin P. Fontenot Scofield, Gerard, Pohorelsky, Gallaugher & Landry 901 Lakeshore Drive, #900 Lake Charles, LA 70601 (337) 433-9436 COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT: CITGO Petroleum Corporation Craig Isenberg Kyle W. Siegel Joshua O. Cox Barrasso Usdin Kupperman Freeman & Sarver, LLC 909 Poydras, Ste 2400 New Orleans, LA 70112 (504) 589-9700 COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT: CITGO Petroleum Corporation Marshall Joseph Simien, Jr. Simien Law Firm One Lakeshore Drive, Suite 1110 Lake Charles, LA 70629 (337) 497-0022 COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT: CITGO Petroleum Corporation Wells Talbot Watson Jake D. Buford Bagget, McCall , Burgess, Watson & Gaughan 3006 Country Club Road Lake Charles, LA 70605 (337) 478-8888 COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE: Rickey Haley Gardenia Amos Sara Stevens Bill Peltier Linda Harris Richard Elliott Wilson Somer G. Brown Cox, Cox, Filo, Camel & Wilson, LLC 723 Broad Street Lake Charles, LA 70601 (337) 436-6611 COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE: Sara Stevens Gardenia Amos Linda Harris Rickey Haley Kirk Albert Patrick, III Heath Savant Donahue, Patrick & Scott 450 Laurel St., Suite 1600 Baton Rouge, LA 70801 (225) 214-1908 COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT: R & R Construction, Inc. PERRET, Judge. For the reasons set forth in the companion and consolidated case hereto, Arceneaux v. Citgo Petroleum Corp., 18-370 (La.App. 3 Cir. __/__/__), __ So.3d __, the judgment of the trial court in favor of Plaintiffs-Appellees and against Appellant, CITGO Petroleum Corporation, is affirmed. All costs of this appeal are assessed against Appellant, CITGO Petroleum Corporation. AFFIRMED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.