HAROLD FILS Vs. STARR INDEMNITY & LIABILITY INSURANCE CO., ET AL.

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT P.O. Box 16577 Lake Charles LA 70616 (337) 433-9403 David Scott Rainwater Taylor, Wellons, Politz 8550 United Plaza Blvd, #101 Baton Rouge LA 70809 Rachel L. Kovach Taylor, Wellons, Politz 8550 United Plaza Blvd., #101 Baton Rouge LA 70809 J. Jacob Chapman Taylor, Wellons,Politz & Duhe 8550 United Plaza Blvd Ste 101 Baton Rouge LA 70809 Paula M. Wellons Taylor, Wellons, Politz 1515 Poydras Street, Ste 1900 New Orleans LA 70112 REHEARING ACTION: March 13, 2019 Docket Number: 17 00896-CA HAROLD FILS VERSUS STARR INDEMNITY & LIABILITY INSURANCE CO., ET AL. Appealed from Lafayette Parish Case No. 20154212 BEFORE JUDGES: Hon. Sylvia R. Cooks Hon. Billy Howard Ezell Hon. D. Kent Savoie As counsel of record in the captioned case, you are hereby notified that the application for rehearing and the request for en banc rehearing filed by Starr Indemnity & Liability Company have this day been DENIED. cc: Kenneth Patrick Haines, Amicus Counsel George Andrew Veazey, Amicus Counsel David Thomas Butler, Jr., Counsel for the Appellee Brenda Sibille Piccione, Counsel for the Appellant Barton Willis Bernard, Counsel for the Appellant Carl Joseph Rachal, Counsel for the Appellant Aaron Broussard, Counsel for the Appellant James Michael Garner, Counsel for the Appellee Peter L. Hilbert, Jr., Counsel for the Appellee Darnell Bludworth, Counsel for the Appellee James Edward Kuhn, Counsel for the Appellee Travis J. Turner, Counsel for the Appellee Theodore Lutrell Jones, Counsel for the Appellee Todd Alexander Rossi, Counsel for the Appellee Mark Daniel Mese, Counsel for the Appellee Troy John Charpentier, Counsel for the Appellee Esteban Herrera, Jr., Counsel for the Appellee James Rodney Chastain Jr., Counsel for the Appellee Michael deBarros, Counsel for the Appellee Matthew C. Coman, Counsel for the Appellee Rebekka C. Veith, Counsel for the Appellee

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.