3RD DISTRICT HIGHWAY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION VERSUS MARANDA M. AND JOE PILLSBURY
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT CA 17-634 3RD DISTRICT HIGHWAY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION VERSUS MARANDA M. AND JOE J. PILLSBURY ********** APPEAL FROM THE LAFAYETTE CITY COURT PARISH OF LAFAYETTE CITY COURT, NO. 2016CV4061 HONORABLE FRANCES MORAN BOUILLION, CITY COURT JUDGE ********** JOHN E. CONERY JUDGE ********** Court composed of Ulysses Gene Thibodeaux, Chief Judge, Billy Howard Ezell, and John E. Conery, Judges. APPEAL DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, CASE REMANDED TO THE TRIAL COURT. Daniel M. Landry, III Christian B. Landry The Landry Law Firm Post Office Box 3784 Lafayette, Louisiana 70502 (337) 237-7135 COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT: 33rd District Highway Federal CreditUnion Maranda M. and Joe J. Pillsbury 110 Bacon Lane Carencro, Louisiana 70520 (337) 654-9759 (337) 654-9718 IN PROPER PERSON AS DEFENDANTS/APPELLEES: Maranda M. and Joe J. Pillsbury CONERY, Judge. The 3rd District Highway Federal Credit Union (Credit Union) filed an appeal seeking to reverse a portion of the trial court’s May 17, 2017 judgment, which awarded the defendants, Maranda M. and Joe J. Pillsbury (Pillsburys), damages in the amount of $1,060.00, to be offset from the amount awarded to the Credit Union. The Credit Union filed a motion for new trial on May 25, 2017, which was denied by the trial court on the basis that the case had settled. Based on the appeal filed by the Credit Union, it appears that the trial court was mistaken in denying the Credit Union’s motion for new trial on the basis of a settlement between the parties. We therefore remand this case to the trial court in order for it to rule on the Credit Union’s motion for new trial. In the interest of judicial economy, within thirty (30) days of this ruling, and by stipulation of all counsel, the record may remain lodged in this court and the final judgment on remand may be added to supplement this record, with the matter then being docketed for final disposition by this panel. APPEAL DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, CASE REMANDED TO THE TRIAL COURT. This opinion is NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. Uniform Rules—Courts of Appeal, Rule 2-16.3.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
