STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS CHONQUARO GREEN

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 14-335 STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS CHONQUARO GREEN ************ APPEAL FROM THE TWENTY-SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF ST. LANDRY, NO. 12K3734D HONORABLE ALONZO HARRIS, DISTRICT JUDGE ************ JOHN D. SAUNDERS JUDGE ************ Court composed of John D. Saunders, Billy H. Ezell, and Phyllis M. Keaty, Judges. APPEAL DISMISSED. Earl B. Taylor District Attorney - 27th JDC P. O. Drawer 1968 Opelousas, LA 70571 COUNSEL FOR APPELLEE: State of Louisiana Brent A. Hawkins Louisiana Appellate Project P. O. Box 3752 Lake Charles, LA 70602 COUNSEL FOR APPELLANT: Chonquaro Green Saunders, Judge The Defendant was charged by bill of indictment with count one, aggravated kidnapping, a violation of La.R.S. 14:44, district court docket number 12-K-3734D, and count two, aggravated rape, a violation of La.R.S. 14:42, district court docket number 12-K-3670-C. The State moved to have the matters consolidated, and the request was granted by the trial court. The charges were consolidated into district court docket number 12-K-3670-C. On July 25, 2013, the jury found the Defendant not guilty of aggravated kidnapping, count one. The jury returned a verdict of guilty to the lesser included offense of forcible rape, count two. In March 2014, this court lodged the record from district court docket number 12-K-3734-D consolidated with 12-K-3670-C assigning it appellate docket number 14-335. On April 24, 2014, this court issued a rule to show cause why the appeal, 14-335, should not be dismissed because district court docket numbers 12K-3670-C and 12-K-3734-D were consolidated into 12-K-3670-C. Additionally, the Defendant was acquitted of the charge of aggravated kidnapping, originally assigned district court docket number 12-K-3734-D. No response was received by Defendant. Accordingly, we hereby dismiss Defendant s appeal. APPEAL DISMISSED. 1

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.