STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS WILCY ERNEST MONCEAUX, SR.

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 12-601 STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS WILCY ERNEST MONCEAUX, SR. ********** APPEAL FROM THE THIRTY-FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF JEFFERSON DAVIS, NO. 703-11 HONORABLE C. STEVE GUNNELL, DISTRICT JUDGE ********** JAMES T. GENOVESE JUDGE ********** Court composed of Jimmie C. Peters, James T. Genovese, and Shannon J. Gremillion, Judges. AFFIRMED. Edward J. Marquet Louisiana Appellate Project Post Office Box 53733 Lafayette, Louisiana 70505-3733 (337) 237-6841 COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT/APPELLANT: Wilcy Ernest Monceaux, Sr. Michael C. Cassidy District Attorney Thirty-First Judicial District Stacey C. Naquin, Assistant District Attorney Post Office Box 1388 Jennings, Louisiana 70546 (337) 824-1893 COUNSEL FOR APPELLEE: State of Louisiana GENOVESE, Judge. In this companion criminal case with State v. Monceaux, 12-599 (La.App. 3 Cir. ---/---/12), --- So.3d ---, Defendant, Wilcy Ernest Monceaux, Sr., pled guilty to the offense of false imprisonment with a dangerous weapon in violation of La.R.S. 14:46.1. In accordance with his plea agreement, Defendant was sentenced to five years at hard labor, suspended, and placed on supervised probation for five years, to run consecutively to the twenty-year hard labor sentence he received by virtue of his plea to attempted manslaughter under Docket No. 12-599 of this court. Defendant has appealed and has presented the identical assignment of error and issue (excessive sentence) as he did under Docket No. 12-599 of this court. Defendant s brief in this matter is identical to his brief regarding the other sentence, and it does not raise any error regarding his false imprisonment plea and sentence. After reviewing the record, we find no errors patent. For the reasons set forth herein and in State v. Monceaux, 12-599 (La.App. 3 Cir. ---/---/12), --- So.3d ---, Defendant s sentence for false imprisonment with a dangerous weapon is affirmed. AFFIRMED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.