STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS JONATHAN L.CITIZEN
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 12-59 STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS JONATHAN L. CITIZEN ********** APPEAL FROM THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF ACADIA, NO. 77,773 HONORABLE GLENNON P. EVERETT, DISTRICT JUDGE ********** J. DAVID PAINTER JUDGE ********** Court composed of Chief Judge Ulysses Gene Thibodeaux, J. David Painter, and Shannon J. Gremillion, Judges. AFFIRMED. Edward J. Marquet Louisiana Appellate Project P.O. Box 53733 Lafayette, LA 70505-3733 (337)237-6841 COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT/APPELLANT: Jonathan L. Citizen Frederick L. Welter, Assistant District Attorney Fifteenth Judicial District, Acadia Parish P.O. Box 288 Crowley, LA 70527-0288 COUNSEL FOR APELLEE: State of Louisiana PAINTER, Judge. Defendant, Jonathan L. Citizen, was convicted of distribution of cocaine, a violation of La.R.S. 40:967(A), on April 13, 2011. The State filed a multiple offender bill of information alleging that Defendant had been convicted of four additional felony offenses. The trial court found Defendant to be at least a third felony offender and sentenced him to life in prison without benefit of probation, parole, or suspension of sentence pursuant to La.R.S. 15:529.1. Defendant filed an appeal of his conviction under this court s docket number 12-58, and we affirmed that conviction. He also filed this appeal of his multiple offender adjudication. We also affirm the trial court s adjudication of Defendant as a multiple offender. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY The facts and procedural history of this case are as set forth in State v. Citizen, 12-58 (La.App. 3 Cir. ___/___/12), ___ So.3d ___, and it is not necessary to restate them here. DISCUSSION Errors Patent In accordance with La.Code Crim.P. art. 920, all appeals are reviewed for errors patent on the face of the record. After reviewing the record, we find that Defendant s sentence is illegally lenient in that the trial court did not impose the sentence at hard labor. However, we take no action with regard to the illegally lenient sentence since it has not been raised as error on appeal. Habitual Offender Adjudication Defendant filed two separate appeals, and the matters were consolidated for briefing purposes only. Defendant s appellate brief contains three assignments of error, all of which refer to issues in his underlying conviction for distribution of cocaine. All of these assignments of error are fully addressed in Citizen, supra. None of the assignments of error pertain to any issues specific to the habitual offender adjudication. Thus, Defendant s adjudication as a multiple offender and his sentence are affirmed. DECREE For the foregoing reasons, Defendant s adjudication as a multiple offender and his sentence to life in prison without benefit of probation, parole, or suspension of sentence are affirmed. AFFIRMED. This opinion is NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. Uniform Rules Courts of Appeal, Rule 2 16.3. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
