STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS LIONEL M. HARBISON
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 11-37 STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS LIONEL M. HARBISON ************ APPEAL FROM THE SIXTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF IBERIA, NO. 06-652 HONORABLE EDWARD LEONARD, JR., DISTRICT JUDGE ************ JAMES T. GENOVESE JUDGE ************ Court composed of Marc T. Amy, James T. Genovese, and Shannon J. Gremillion, Judges. APPEAL DISMISSED. THE DEFENDANT IS PERMITTED TO FILE AN APPLICATION FOR SUPERVISORY WRITS WITHIN THIRTY DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS OPINION. Hon. J. Phillip Haney District Attorney, 16th JDC 300 Iberia Street, Suite 200 New Iberia, LA 70560 (337) 369-4420 COUNSEL FOR APPELLEE: State of Louisiana Mark Owen Foster Louisiana Appellate Project P. O. Box 2057 Natchitoches, LA 71457 (318) 572-5693 COUNSEL FOR APPELLANT: Lionel M. Harbison Genovese, Judge. The Defendant entered a plea of guilty to manslaughter on August 11, 2008, and was sentenced to fifteen years at hard labor. On August 3, 2010, the Defendant filed an application for post-conviction relief seeking to withdraw his guilty plea. The trial court denied the application on August 18, 2010. On October 6, 2010, the Defendant filed a motion for appeal, seeking to appeal the trial court s denial of his application for post-conviction relief. The motion was subsequently granted. On January 11, 2011, an appeal was lodged with this court. Thereafter, this court issued a rule to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed as the judgment at issue is not an appealable judgment. La.Code Crim.P. art. 912.1. In response, the Defendant alleged the trial court granted him an out-of-time appeal. The judgment at issue is not appealable pursuant to La.Code Crim.P. art. 912.1, and the Defendant neither requested nor was granted an out-of-time appeal. That being the case, the Defendant s appeal is hereby dismissed. However, the Defendant may seek supervisory writs within thirty days of the date of this decision. The Defendant is not required to file a notice of intent to seek writs nor obtain an order from the trial court setting a return date as is generally required by Uniform Rules Courts of Appeal, Rule 4-3. APPEAL DISMISSED. THE DEFENDANT IS PERMITTED TO FILE AN APPLICATION FOR SUPERVISORY WRITS WITHIN THIRTY DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS OPINION.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
