ROBERT KEVIN MCCARTNEY, ET AL. VERSUS GEORGE MCCORMICK, ET AL.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 10-1225 ROBERT KEVIN MCCARTNEY, ET AL. VERSUS GEORGE MCCORMICK, ET AL. ********** APPEAL FROM THE NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF RAPIDES, NO. 225,011 HONORABLE F. RAE DONALDSON SWENT, DISTRICT JUDGE ********** ELIZABETH A. PICKETT JUDGE ********** Court composed of Ulysses Gene Thibodeaux, Chief Judge, Sylvia R. Cooks, and Elizabeth A. Pickett, Judges. AFFIRMED. William M. Ford P. O. Box 12424 Alexandria, LA 71315-2424 (318) 442-8899 Counsel for Defendants/Appellees: Estate of George McCormick and Susan McCormick, Executrix Robert Lewis Bussey Assistant District Attorney P. O. Box 307 Alexandria, LA 71309-0307 (318) 449-1937 Counsel for Defendants/Appellees: Charles Wagner James Downs James Buck Clifford Royce Stridder III Rapides Parish District Attorney s Office Elaine McCartney Aubrey McCartney P.O. Box 411 Tioga, LA 71477 Pro Se Robert Kevin McCartney, Individually and on behalf of his minor children, Samantha Nida and Jeremy Gerwaski DWCC H3A 670 Bell Hill Road Homer, LA 71040 Pro Se PICKETT, Judge. The plaintiffs, Aubrey McCartney, Elaine McCartney, and Robert Kevin McCartney, Individually and on behalf of his minor children, all of whom appear in proper person, appeal the trial court s dismissal of their Motion to Refix: Show Cause Hearing Pursuant To Fraud in the September 29, 2008, Judgment in which they sought to have the judgment declared an absolute nullity on the basis of fraud. The trial court denied the Motion to Refix without setting it for a hearing, noting it was Denied failure to state proper grounds for nullity under La.C.C.P. art. 2001-2006. On appeal, the plaintiffs filed a Motion [to] Strike and Answer to Appellee s Brief in which they seek to strike the appellees brief because the appellees did not oppose the Motion to Refix in the trial court and because the brief allegedly includes false statements of fact. The Motion to Strike was referred to the merits of the appeal. We have thoroughly examined the allegations set forth in the plaintiffs Motion to Refix and their Motion [to] Strike and the arguments asserted in their appellate brief and find none of their allegations or arguments have any merit. Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
