STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS ROBERT MILTON ROBINSON

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 09-0735 STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS ROBERT MILTON ROBINSON ************ APPEAL FROM THE TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF NATCHITOCHES, NO. C14227 HONORABLE ERIC R. HARRINGTON, DISTRICT JUDGE ************ JIMMIE C. PETERS JUDGE ************ Court composed of Jimmie C. Peters, Marc T. Amy, and Michael G. Sullivan, Judges. AFFIRMED. R. Stuart Wright Assistant District Attorney 10th Judicial District P. O. Box 838 Natchitoches, LA 71458-0838 (318) 357-2214 COUNSEL FOR APPELLEE: State of Louisiana Edward K. Bauman Louisiana Appellate Project P. O. Box 1641 Lake Charles, LA 70602 (318) 491-0570 COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT/APPELLANT: Robert Milton Robinson PETERS, J. The State of Louisiana (state) charged the defendant, Robert Milton Robinson, by bill of information with possession of cocaine, in violation of La.R.S. 40:967. The defendant initially pled not guilty to the offense, but subsequently withdrew his former plea and entered a plea of guilty to the charge. Thereafter, the trial court sentenced him to serve four years at hard labor. The defendant then perfected this appeal, asserting in his one assignment of error that the sentence imposed was excessive. The defendant did not object at sentencing and did not file a motion to reconsider the sentence imposed. Failure to object and failure to timely file a motion to reconsider the sentence imposed precludes review of the sentence on appeal. State v. Bamburg, 00-675 (La.App. 3 Cir. 11/2/00), 772 So.2d 356. See also State v. Williams, 01-998 (La.App. 3 Cir. 2/6/02), 815 So.2d 908, writ denied, 02-578 (La. 1/31/03), 836 So.2d 59. Thus, we find that the defendant has waived his right to seek review of his sentence. DISPOSITION We affirm the defendant s sentence in all respects. AFFIRMED. This opinion is NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. Rule 216.3, Uniform Rules, Courts of Appeal.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.