STATE OF LOUISIANA Vs. BREYIANA BROWN
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF LOUISIANA * VERSUS * NO. 2019-KA-0248 COURT OF APPEAL BREYIANA BROWN * FOURTH CIRCUIT * STATE OF LOUISIANA ******* APPEAL FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT ORLEANS PARISH NO. 531-281, SECTION “E” Honorable Keva M. Landrum-Johnson, Judge ****** Judge Roland L. Belsome ****** ON REMAND FROM THE LOUISIANA SUPREME COURT (Court composed of Judge Roland L. Belsome, Judge Daniel L. Dysart, Judge Joy Cossich Lobrano) LOBRANO, J., CONCURS IN THE RESULT. G. Benjamin Cohen Cormac S. Boyle THE PROMISE OF JUSTICE INITIATIVE 1024 Elysian Fields Avenue New Orleans, LA 70117 COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT/APPELLANT Donna Andrieu Irena Zajickova ASSISTANT DISTRIC ATTORNEY Leon Cannizzaro DISTRICT ATTORNEY ORLEANS PARISH 619 S. White Street New Orleans, LA 70119 COUNSEL FOR THE STATE OF LOUISIANA/APPELLEE VACATED AND REMANDED OCTOBER 14, 2020 RLB This matter is on remand from the Louisiana Supreme Court pursuant to the DLD United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 U.S. –– ––, 140 S.Ct. 1390, 206 L.Ed.2d 583 (2020) (holding that jury verdicts in state felony trials must be unanimous). State v. Brown, 19-KA-0248, 2020 WL 1056803 (La. App. 4 Cir. 03/04/2020), writ granted in part, 20-K-0442, 2020 WL 5904879 (La. 10/06/20). For the reasons that follow, we vacate Breyiana Brown’s manslaughter conviction and remand for further proceedings. RELEVANT FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY Defendant, Breyiana Brown, was convicted of manslaughter by a nonunanimous jury.1 This Court affirmed her manslaughter conviction. See State v. Brown, 19-KA-0248, 2020 WL 1056803, at *8 (La. App. 4 Cir. 03/04/2020). Defendant sought review by the Louisiana Supreme Court. During the pendency of her writ application, the United States Supreme Court issued its ruling in Ramos. Thereafter, the Louisiana Supreme Court granted Defendant’s writ application specifically regarding the issue of the non-unanimous manslaughter verdict. 1 Defendant was also convicted of obstruction of justice, possession with the intent to distribute and illegal possession of a stolen firearm by a unanimous jury. Those convictions are now final and not the subject of this remand. 1 Brown, 19-KA-0248, 2020 WL 1056803 (La. App. 4 Cir. 03/04/2020), writ granted in part, 20-K-0442, 2020 WL 5904879 (La. 10/06/20). DISCUSSION On appeal, one of Defendant’s assignments of error challenged the constitutionality of her manslaughter conviction by a non-unanimous jury verdict. Under Ramos, jury verdicts for felony convictions must be unanimous. Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 U.S. ––––, 140 S.Ct. 1390, 206 L.Ed.2d 583 (2020). Since Defendant’s case was pending on direct review when Ramos was decided, the United States Supreme Court’s decision is applicable. See Schriro v. Summerlin, 542 U.S. 348, 351, 124 S.Ct. 2519, 2522, 159 L.Ed.2d 442 (2004) (observing that “[w]hen a decision of [the United States Supreme Court] results in a ‘new rule,’ that rule applies to all criminal cases still pending on direct review”). Therefore, because Defendant’s conviction was based on a non-unanimous jury verdict, her manslaughter conviction is vacated. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, Defendant’s manslaughter conviction is vacated and the matter remanded for further proceedings. VACATED AND REMANDED 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
