CINDY WILLIAMS Vs. NORMAN S. HALEY

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

CINDY WILLIAMS * NO. 2019-CA-0116 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL NORMAN S. HALEY * FOURTH CIRCUIT * STATE OF LOUISIANA * * ******* CONSOLIDATED WITH: CONSOLIDATED WITH: CINDY H. WILLIAMS NO. 2019-CA-0479 VERSUS NORMAN S. HALEY ATKINS, J., CONCURS IN THE RESULT DNA I concur with the majority that the motion to strike should be denied. The granting of motion to strike is a drastic remedy that is only proper when the allegations being challenged are so unrelated to the plaintiff’s claims that they do not warrant consideration and are prejudicial to the moving party. Gebre v. City of New Orleans, 2014-0904, p. 12, n. 7 (La. App. 4 Cir. 10/7/15), 177 So.3d 723, 733 (citing Carr v. Abel, 2010-0835, pp. 7-8 (La. App. 5 Cir. 3/29/11), 64 So.3d 292, 296). While I find this remedy is not appropriate here, I also note that many of Ms. Williams’ statements on appeal that Mr. Haley “body slammed” her are not substantiated by the record.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.