STATE OF LOUISIANA Vs. LARRY RUDOLPH
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF LOUISIANA * NO. 2018-KA-0630 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL LARRY RUDOLPH * FOURTH CIRCUIT * STATE OF LOUISIANA * * ******* RML LEDET, J., CONCURS WITH REASONS I write separately to emphasize that our rejection of Mr. Rudolph’s double jeopardy claim is grounded in the absence, rather than the presence, of relevant evidence in the record. Accordingly, our decision should not be regarded as the law of the case; and I would reserve Mr. Rudolph’s right on remand to renew his double jeopardy claim and to pursue any and all relevant evidence, including testimony, in support of such claim. For these reasons, I respectfully concur.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
