STATE OF LOUISIANA Vs. ANTHONY CINQUEMANO

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

STATE OF LOUISIANA * NO. 2018-KA-0532 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL ANTHONY CINQUEMANO * FOURTH CIRCUIT * STATE OF LOUISIANA * * ******* MCKAY, C.J., DISSENTS IN PART I respectfully dissent in part from the majority’s opinion in this matter. I would affirm the district court’s judgments denying the State’s continuance. The district court based its decision on the State’s failure secure its witness for trial. Based on the record before this Court the State failed to provide sufficient proof to satisfy the requirements for a continuance based on absence of a witness pursuant to La. C.Cr. P. art. 709.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.