MARY FIVEASH Vs. PAT O'BRIEN'S BAR, INC. AND ABC INSURANCE COMPANY
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
MARY FIVEASH * NO. 2015-CA-1230 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL PAT O'BRIEN'S BAR, INC. AND ABC INSURANCE COMPANY * FOURTH CIRCUIT * STATE OF LOUISIANA * * ******* DYSART, J., DISSENTS, WITH REASONS. I respectfully dissent. A party claiming spoliation of evidence must prove that the defendant intentionally destroyed the evidence for the purpose of depriving the opposing party of its use. Quinn v. RISO, 030903 (La.App. 4 Cir. 3/3/04), 869 So.2d 922, 927. In short, to find that spoliation of the evidence has occurred, our law requires a showing of bad faith or bad conduct. Guillory v. Pellerin, 2009WL690543; Yelton v. PHI, Inc., 284 F.R.D. 374 (E.D.La. 2012). Here, the defective step in question was located in a highly trafficked area in Pat O’ Brien’s Bar and required repair so as to avoid future accidents. Photos of the step both before and after the repair were available. The nature of the step (or threshold) was not changed, but only repaired to make it safe. There was open communication between counsel before and during the repair. Further, the obviously open nature of and public access to the area allowed before the repair precluded any bad faith effort to destroy evidence. I would deny the writ.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
