STATE OF LOUISIANA Vs. ERIK NUNEZ

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

STATE OF LOUISIANA * NO. 2015-K-0164 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL ERIK NUNEZ * FOURTH CIRCUIT * STATE OF LOUISIANA * * ******* CONSOLIDATED WITH: CONSOLIDATED WITH: STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 2015-K-0449 VERSUS BRANDON LICCIARDI TOBIAS, J., CONCURS. I respectfully concur. I write separately only to state that I do not find that the proper procedural vehicle to challenge the allotment of a criminal case is a motion to quash. Rather, in my view, the proper procedural vehicle is a mere motion to reallot. The motions filed in this case, although phrased as quashal in nature, must be read to be merely as motions to reallot because the case was not randomly allotted pursuant to State v. Simpson, 551 So.2d 1303 (La.1989) and its progeny. See also State v. Brown, 15-0122 (La. App. 4 Cir. 7/6/15), __ So.3d __.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.