CONNIE CHATELAIN Vs. FLUOR DANIEL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A AS DEL-JEN, INC., DEF INSURANCE COMPANY, JOHN DOE, INC., AND XYZ INSURANCE COMPANY

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
CONNIE CHATELAIN * NO. 2014-CA-1312 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL FLUOR DANIEL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A AS DEL-JEN, INC., DEF INSURANCE COMPANY, JOHN DOE, INC., AND XYZ INSURANCE COMPANY * FOURTH CIRCUIT * STATE OF LOUISIANA * * ******* TOBIAS, J., CONCURS IN PART AND DISSENTS IN PART. I respectfully concur in part, finding like the majority that the trial court did not err in granting Guilford’s motion for summary judgment. I respectfully dissent in part from the majority’s finding that the trial court erred in granting Reavis’ motion for summary judgment and dismissing Fluor’s claims against Reavis for the reasons assigned by Judge Dysart.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.