STATE OF LOUISIANA IN THE INTEREST OF T.E.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF LOUISIANA IN THE INTEREST OF T.E. * NO. 2011-CA-1172 * COURT OF APPEAL * FOURTH CIRCUIT * STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS * * ******* JONES, C.J., DISSENTS WITH REASONS The majority finds that the juvenile court erred in its factual determinations that the evidence of the arresting officer, coupled with the video placed in evidence, were insufficient to adjudicate T.E., a delinquent. Because I disagree, I respectfully dissent. The majority pronounces a new rule that to find this juvenile delinquent, the juvenile court was required to determine both the make and model of the weapon before the court could determine that the juvenile in fact possessed a weapon. The majority cites no legal authority for this determination, thus pronounces a new rule with which I cannot concur. Thus, for these reasons, I respectfully dissent. 1
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
