THE CADLE COMPANY Vs. HARRY S. ANDERSON
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
THE CADLE COMPANY * NO. 2009-CA-0068 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL HARRY S. ANDERSON * FOURTH CIRCUIT (CIVIL DISTRICT COURT, ORLEANS PARISH# 2005-12301) Division “K-5” * STATE OF LOUISIANA * * ******* ON REHEARING GRANTED ******* This Court grants rehearing on its own motion in order to clarify its judgment rendered on July 30, 2009 by changing the first sentence found at the top of page “2” of judgment which currently reads as follows: Mr. Anderson was not personally named or served in the default judgment. That sentence shall now read as follows: Mr. Anderson was not personally named or served in the suit. Nor was he named or cast in judgment in the default judgment. In all other respects the language of the judgment shall remain as originally written. New Orleans, Louisiana this ____ day of _______________, 2009. ________________________________________ CHIEF JUDGE JOAN BERNARD ARMSTRONG ________________________________________ JUDGE JAMES F. MCKAY, III ________________________________________ JUDGE MAX N. TOBIAS, JR. 235913
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
