JAKE JOHN SCHIRO, SR., INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATES OF DOLORES SCHULTE SCHIRO, JAKE JOHN SCHIRO, JR. AND CYNTHIA ANN SCHIRO Vs. ACADIAN AMBULANCE SERVICE, INC. AND ABC INSURANCE COMPANY

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

JAKE JOHN SCHIRO, SR., INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATES OF DOLORES SCHULTE SCHIRO, JAKE JOHN SCHIRO, JR. AND CYNTHIA ANN SCHIRO * NO. 2007-CA-0519 * COURT OF APPEAL * FOURTH CIRCUIT * STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS * ACADIAN AMBULANCE SERVICE, INC. AND ABC INSURANCE COMPANY * ******* LOVE, J., CONCURS IN THE RESULTS AND ASSIGNS REASONS I respectfully concur in the result of the majority. The plaintiff never asserted any claims against Acadian Ambulance based on medical malpractice. The plaintiff also never submitted his claim to a medical review panel, as required in actions against qualified health care providers pursuant to La. R.S. 40:1299.47(B)(a)(i). Unlike the majority, I find that this case presents a procedural deficiency, which does not necessitate substantive analysis.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.